Total Weight:
57 lbs (25.85 kg)
Battery Weight:
7 lbs (3.17 kg)
Motor Weight:
8 lbs (3.62 kg)
Frame Material:
6061 Aluminum Alloy
Frame Sizes:
17.5in(44.45cm) in (44.45 cm)19 in (48.26 cm)Geometry Measurements:
Small/ Medium 17.5" (593 mm Top Tube, 444.5 mm Seat Tube, 1107 mm Wheelbase), Medium/ Large 19" (620 mm Top Tube, 482.6 Seat Tube, 1134 mm Wheelbase)
Frame Types:
High-Step
Frame Colors:
White, Black, Fluorescent Green
Frame Fork Details:
Rigid Aluminum Alloy, 15 mm Thru-Axle
Attachment Points:
Rear Rack Bosses, Front Rack Bosses, Fender Bosses
Gearing Details:
10
Speed 1x10 SRAM X5, PowerGlide™ 1070 11-36T CassetteShifter Details:
Shimano Tourney TX50 Thumb Shifter Plus on Right Handle Bar
Cranks:
FSA Comet 36T, Q-factor 209 Fat Bike Crankset (S/ M 170 mm, M/ L 175 mm)
Pedals:
Wellgo Aluminum Alloy Platform
Headset:
FSA tapered 1 1/8″- 1 1/2″
Stem:
Forged Alloy Stem
Handlebar:
Aluminum Aloy Flat, 122 mm
Brake Details:
Tektro Auriga Hydraulic Disc with 160 mm Rotors, Tektro Auriga Levers
Grips:
Flat Rubber
Saddle:
Performance
Seat Post:
6061 Aluminum Alloy
Seat Post Length:
325 mm
Seat Post Diameter:
31.8 mm
Rims:
Single Wall Aluminum, 80 mm (Optional 100 mm)
Spokes:
36
Tire Brand:
IKenda Juggernaut, 26" x 4"
Wheel Sizes:
26 in (66.04cm)Tube Details:
Schrader Valve
Accessories:
Optional RST Renegade Suspension Fork (Also Compatible with Rockshox Bluto), Optional Kenda Juggernaut Sport, 26" x 4.5", Optional Aluminum Fenders, Optional Aluminum Racks (Front and Rear)
Other:
Waterproof Grade IP65 Display Panel, Locking Removable Battery Pack, Quick Release Front Wheel
jazz99
9 years agoThanks for the review. Pretty sharp looking fat eBike. I didn’t think 350watt rear hub would be adequate for the weight of this Boar but as you pointed out it is more than enough. My only real hesitation would be the lack of throttle. I think it is a nice feature to have and I don’t think I would buy a bike without one. I do peddle 95% of the time but that 5% I do want to throttle only.
ReplyCourt Rye
9 years agoHonestly… I feel the same concerns, I put “no throttle” at the top of the cons list with this in mind. I see why they made this choice but I like to have the ability to ride the bike in different ways. Still a great bike but it seems like keeping the throttle on (or just a slim trigger throttle) could have been cheap and would have added versatility.
ReplyZak
9 years agoI have been waiting for this bike to come out for some time now… Looks like a really nice package overall. A bit concerned the 350W hub motor might not provide quite enough power for my intended riding (singletrack with quite a few hills and snow as well). Having a real hard time deciding whether to pick up one of these or build up a Trek Farley 5 or Norco Bigfoot using the BBSHD kit (with Dolphin pack battery) from Lunacycle. Any advice would be greatly appreciated? Thanks a bunch!
ReplyCourt Rye
9 years agoThose all sound like great options but the BBSHD is pretty sweet… way faster if you want to go off-road and unlock it and you’ve got the efficiency and climbing power of a mid-drive along with quick release options for your wheels, better weight distribution too. I just reviewed the BBSHD from e-RAD which has shift sensing and it was built into a fat bike… I haven’t reviewed Lunacycle’s stuff but it’s probably similar. Hope this helps! I really liked the Boar E350 and it climbed well enough for me, actually felt very strong for a relatively average sized motor.
ReplyAd-B
9 years agoGreat review. Thanks, though I wasn’t entirely convinced of the logic of reviewing with the totally different bars than it’s supplied with ;) Looks like a nice package. I have 2 questions that I couldn’t really answer from the review . 1) Wondering if it’s realistic to expect to be able to take one of these (with the front fork option) off road & on rocky trails with steepish inclines? 2) If a rider of over 6 foot could get away with the M/L size by putting a longer stem on?
ReplyCourt Rye
9 years agoGood point, I normally strive to review ebikes as stock as possible… this was a bit of an exception based on time constraints. The guys had been experimenting with a bunch of different builds and I figured it would be fun to test their custom setup for variety. As far as off-road with steeper terrain, I’m definitely in favor of the suspension for for comfort though it does raise the price and weight. Depending on your body type and size you may have success climbing… I was very impressed with how it performed in my limited test going off-road at Whistler. For taller riders, yeah the longer and taller stem would help but also extending the seat post and maybe considering different riser bars but make sure they are tight if you’re going off-road so you don’t hit a bump and have the bars swivel forward or down with the extra weight and force :)
ReplyJack
9 years agoCourt, you couldn’t have picked a better setting for a review of this kind. Really puts one in the right frame of mind! But good grief, what a terrible (terrible!) place for the charging power connector. I’ve seen perhaps 5 reviews now of bikes with this battery form factor, yet not a single mention of this location at the bottom of the down tube & behind a flimsy rubber cover. Moisture penetration and corrosion of the connectors are inevitable and not just for folks riding seaside trails where salt penetrates everything. Let’s also consider the composite water/chemicals mix that stands on streets after a rainfall. Every bike brings its own set of compromises, to be sure. But let’s consider how frequently you mention the value of being able to charge a bike’s battery without removing it from the bike. To the extent that’s a ‘Pro’, then surely the potential loss of that power connector with time and usage is a ‘Con’. And when the power connector’s + and – short? Yikes! (You might ask Mark Wanger or someone of comparable technical knowledge about this location to hear what they think).
ReplyCourt Rye
9 years agoI see your point Jack and understand the concern. I haven’t dug into it as much because it’s not a problem I’ve experienced (due to lack of time with one particular model and exposure to the elements). The downtube should block a lot of moisture but I could see how splashing from shoes and legs could get onto the cover. Here’s a better shot of the rubberized cover, it appeared to seal well during my best but I’ll dig a bit deeper next time I come across a model with this same battery design. Have you personally had issues with battery port corrosion? Parts of my car, traditional bikes and tools have all experienced rust over months and years of use so I can see how this migh thappen with an ebike and the battery port as well. If the rubber cap is used and the pack is wiped down with a dry or slightly damp rag after rides the issue should be significantly reduced I would think? Storing inside in a cool dry location would also help to extend the life of the cells while reducing damage from salty air or humidity and extreme temperatures :)
ReplyJack
9 years agoThanks for giving this some thought, Court. As for the ‘cover’ offering protection, the rubber will harden as it ages and doesn’t appear to offer a true seal in the first place. Corrosion is an insidious thing and especially so in coastal climates (where I would think fat bikes might be quite appealing). Perhaps it’s many years of experience on boats and coastal living that color my concern. There’s no real way to ‘wipe off’ the connector’s internal surfaces…and of course, plugging in a USB cable eliminates even the partial protection offered by the cover. This battery’s form factor may be new enough that we haven’t seen corrosion issues appear yet…but I’m pretty confident it will.
ReplyCourt Rye
9 years agoWell, you’ve got a solid point there! Several actually… Thanks again Jack, I’ll be sure to mention these things in the future for this and other batteries that might have design concerns for wet/messy environments :)
ReplyDave Dempsey
9 years agoI am seriously thinking about buying an electric bike and leaning towards the the Surface 604 Boar.
ReplyIn that price range of around $3000 is there any other consideratoins I should check out. I do like what the Boar has to offer and I see they have carbon fibre frame ebike coming out soon too. Should I wait for the ebike carbon Surface to arrive or go with the boar for now, or is there something better I should be looking at that offers the same as the Surface ???
Court Rye
9 years agoHi Dave! I really enjoyed the Boar E350 and appreciated some of the upgrades made to it from the original Surface 604 fat bike… This is always a difficult question answer as we near mid-season and you start hearing about next-year models. In my experience, it’s easy to get excited and feel like waiting but then regret it later as bikes hit shipping delays and you miss out on today’s good riding. This happened big time in 2016 with some ports (in Los Angeles) being nearly frozen due to strikes and other issues. I know a lot of people who had to wait longer than they would have preferred for their dream bike. The current Boar E350 is solid and if you can get it from a shop today they I would not hesitate… unless you don’t plan on riding it right away, it that case waiting could make sense.
ReplyPeter
7 years agoWe are very disappointed with our Rook. Our local dealer has told us that the company knows the console on last year’s model does not accurately reflect the range but has no plans to do anything about it. They have apparently fixed the problem on later models but are leaving us out in the cold. As well, our battery has no range. Typically, it will go for about 24 – 30 km and then die on the next steep hill. Our dealer has said that Surface 604 admits the true range is close to 50km and further, that it must be plugged in before every trip.
This has not been our experience. The battery dies after less than 30km on a 3% grade where the battery is either off or on level 1 pedal assist. Finally, Pro Surface has not done anything to help. Sorry for the bummer on this bike.
Replycourt
7 years agoAww, that is a bummer! I appreciate you sharing this lackluster experience, to help others, and do hope that Surface can help you in some way. I visited their HQ and saw lots of replacement parts. Have you reached out directly to them? Range is a highly variable stat, it depends on so many factors, but having the battery die is something else… maybe there’s a bigger issue here or something faulty with your specific pack?
Reply